Roman Republican Sieges
Operations in Gaul and Hispania Sieges and siege-related activities played a significant role in the development of Romeâs power in Hispania and Gaul during the late-Roman Republic. They were made possible by the efficient Roman âmilitary machineâ available to commanders during this period â a constantly adapting and improving army, highly regularised encampments and lethal artillery. The narration of Caesarâs sieges by Caesar himself and his literary successor Hirtius, makes them seem unusual and inventive, probably to emphasise Caesarâs brilliance as a military commander. They were not that different or new though, as shown by the close similarity between established Hellenistic siege practices and the general evidence of sieges in Gaul and Hispania. It can often seem that siege fieldworks were âoperation-specificâ to sieges, but essentially just mining and ramps were siege-only techniques. Most of the other works were simply implementations of the normal repertoire of the armyâs fortifications, just as the artillery and weaponry were used in all types of conflicts. This becomes apparent when looking at the wide variety of Roman military installations emerging in the Iberian Peninsula. Sieges are not mere mechanical exercises in military technology and tactics, as often seems in academic discussions, but people are at the centre of it all, with troops and besieged suffering alike. Sieges are consequently considered here within âwarfare ecologyâ â the severe environmental impact, the suffering health and well-being of all involved, even changes to the smellscape, much of which continued for the besieged long after the siege had ended and troops had departed.
Sieges were central to Romeâs conquest of Gaul and Hispania. This book explores how Republican armies planned, built and fought sieges, from artillery and camps to environmental impact and human suffering. Moving beyond Caesarâs dramatic accounts, it reveals siege warfare as a familiar, adaptable and deeply human experience.
Original: $95.31
-65%$95.31
$33.36Product Information
Product Information
Shipping & Returns
Shipping & Returns
Description
Operations in Gaul and Hispania Sieges and siege-related activities played a significant role in the development of Romeâs power in Hispania and Gaul during the late-Roman Republic. They were made possible by the efficient Roman âmilitary machineâ available to commanders during this period â a constantly adapting and improving army, highly regularised encampments and lethal artillery. The narration of Caesarâs sieges by Caesar himself and his literary successor Hirtius, makes them seem unusual and inventive, probably to emphasise Caesarâs brilliance as a military commander. They were not that different or new though, as shown by the close similarity between established Hellenistic siege practices and the general evidence of sieges in Gaul and Hispania. It can often seem that siege fieldworks were âoperation-specificâ to sieges, but essentially just mining and ramps were siege-only techniques. Most of the other works were simply implementations of the normal repertoire of the armyâs fortifications, just as the artillery and weaponry were used in all types of conflicts. This becomes apparent when looking at the wide variety of Roman military installations emerging in the Iberian Peninsula. Sieges are not mere mechanical exercises in military technology and tactics, as often seems in academic discussions, but people are at the centre of it all, with troops and besieged suffering alike. Sieges are consequently considered here within âwarfare ecologyâ â the severe environmental impact, the suffering health and well-being of all involved, even changes to the smellscape, much of which continued for the besieged long after the siege had ended and troops had departed.
Sieges were central to Romeâs conquest of Gaul and Hispania. This book explores how Republican armies planned, built and fought sieges, from artillery and camps to environmental impact and human suffering. Moving beyond Caesarâs dramatic accounts, it reveals siege warfare as a familiar, adaptable and deeply human experience.








